Did you know that when your organization treats conflict as a bad thing, it can really cost the organization? It can cost money, productivity,
opportunity. Take, for example, the large company we consulted with several years ago where employees were discouraged from disagreeing with managers. Because they couldn’t openly disagree, they did what people do when they feel disempowered: They undermined, they sabotaged, they whined, they formed subterranean teams. They became human monkey wrenches in the company machine. We asked an executive how much of the time this went on. He estimated 20 percent. That’s one day a week when employees are not only unproductive, but actively creating problems. That’s a lot of lost productivity and opportunity cost!
Conflict isn’t actually a bad thing. When we work with managers and employees and talk about conflict resolution, we can see that a lot of people are very conflict averse. That comes from misunderstanding what conflict is. Conflict does not equal yelling or fighting, being angry or being hurt. Conflict provides an opportunity to get on the same page. Frequently, though a dialog where there is conflict, you end up digging more deeply into the subject and coming up with fresh solutions.
Think of it this way, there are four ways to resolve an issue:
- Yes: Meaning, yes I agree, we’ll do it that way and I will wholeheartedly throw my energy and enthusiasm behind that decision.
- No But Let’s Discuss It: We don’t agree but I’m open to finding a compromise or middle ground.
- No: I don’t agree with you and I’m going my separate way.
- Yes, But No: I am going to pretend to agree with you because I don’t feel safe disagreeing, but I still don’t agree and I’m going to find ways to mess this up.
Yes But No is passive aggressive behavior and you can pretty much expect it to crop up in any company where healthy conflict isn’t specifically encouraged. Yes, But No encourages CYA behavior and involves a lot of your employees’ mental and physical energy in forming alliances, creating elaborate plans for retaliation, lying, slowing projects’ progress and other activities that don’t get your organization’s goals met, at all.
So how do you encourage healthy conflict? Like everything else, it has to come from the top. Top management has to let employees know that they are free to RESPECTFULLY share their opinions, introduce contrary ideas and suggestions and dissent from a perspective that comes from the top. Then, top management has to make sure that that freedom remains intact throughout the organization. If managers believe they can, with respect, disagree with their superiors, employees will see that and be more encouraged to express their own perspectives.
Of course, peers in an organization aren’t always going to be able to resolve the issue between themselves and that’s where a management hierarchy comes in. If one employee says it should be red and the other pink, they can take it to a manager—the Decider—for a verdict. The key is that once the Decider has decided—say, red—the employee who wanted pink has to accept that that’s the answer and move on. Unless you’ve specifically hired or trained people for that skill, you have some teaching to do. Some people have never seen what healthy, direct conflict resolution looks like. It can be initially scary for them to speak up.
This doesn’t happen overnight. It takes an investment of time, training, and yes, money, to hire someone who can affect this transformation in your organization. But when you weigh that against one day a week essentially going to Machiavellian power tactics, it’s probably worth it.
We work with companies on a project basis or on retainer, providing a custom level of HR help designed for your business. Contact me at Caroline@valentinehr.com or call (512) 420-8267.
One Response to “That Passive Aggressive Employee is Costing You Money”
Thanks for including the issue of Conflict Management in the workplace….Perhaps the next step is proposing some skills training for the manager, so he can graduate from “decider” into “mediator.” There is a good difference between the two, the mediator listening to both sides’ opinions and trying to broker an agreement between the two. Of course, finally, the decision arrived at will be converted in part of the job description for both sides, so the manager goes back to his own role.
In my book I deal with the passive aggressive employee, who is resistant to mediation and that needs to be dealt with using other ways. This issue can be a real challenge for workers not educated in the identification of passive aggressive behavior, who can get trapped into paralysis and confusion.